DOI: https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.4.275-290

The green battle in the media: A framing analysis of environmental press coverage

 -Anna Mateu  -Martí Domínguez


Full Text:     PDF (46)   
         View in DADUN


Abstract

 93
The analysis of environmental media coverage using framing theory allows us to study and compare its evolution over time and establish a typology to discuss how the media echoes environmental issues and controversies. In this article, we propose a framing typology for environmental discourses, based on previous typologies and expanded with the different interpretive frames we have identified in environment-related opinion texts published in two historical periods: the 1980s and the year 2018. This frame typology can be used in the analysis of reporting about environmental movements and conflicts, and to other practical cases of environmental hot topics like climate change. The analysis of the environmental discourse in the press can be very useful to establish the evolution of this type of discourse in our society and the predominant concept of nature at a particular time.

Keywords

Framing; environmentalist movements; environment; environmental communication; press


Authors

Anna Mateu e-mail (Login required)

Martí Domínguez e-mail (Login required)

References

Anderson, A. G. (2014). Media, environment and the network society. Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Ardèvol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing theory in communication research. Origins, development and current situation in Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 70, 423-450. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1053en

Blanco Castilla, E., Quesada, M. & Teruel Rodríguez, L. (2013). From Kyoto to Durban. Mass media editorial position about climate change. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 68, 420-435. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-983en

Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61, 246–263. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x

Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A. & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it… and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19, 7-23. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811

Carragee, K. M. & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x

Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Rereading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 223–243. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775

Carvalho, A. (2008). Media(ted) discourse and society. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 161–177. https:// www.doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848162 Castelló, E. (2010). Framing news on risk industries: Local journalism and Conditioning factors. Journalism, 11(4), 463-480. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1464884910367592

Cheng, L., Igartua, J. J., Palacios, E., Acosta, T. & Palito, S. (2010). Framing immigration news in Spanish regional press. International Migration, 56, 197-215. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00647.x

D’Angelo, P. & Kuypers, J. A. (2010). Introduction: Doing news framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-13). New York: Routledge.

Day, A. G. & Golan, G. (2005). Source and content diversity in op-ed pages: Assessing editorial strategies in The New York Times and The Washington Post. Journalism Studies, 6(1), 61- 71. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/1461670052000328212

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

Gamson, W. A. & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405

Hansen, A. (2011). Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 7-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386739

Lopera, E. & Moreno, C. (2014). The uncertainties of climate change in Spanish daily newspapers: Content analysis of press coverage from 2000 to 2010. Journal of Science Communication, 13(1). https://www.doi.org/10.22323/2.13010202

López Rabadán, P. (2010). Nuevas vías para el estudio del framing periodístico. La noción de estrategia de encuadre. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 16, 235-258. Retrieved from https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/ESMP/article/view/ESMP1010110235A

Maibach, E., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P., Akerlof, K. & Diao, G. (2010). Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 299. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-299

Mateu, A. & Domínguez, M. (2011). Inicios del columnismo ambiental en la prensa española: La campaña de Las Provincias sobre la urbanización de El Saler (Valencia, España). Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación 30, 171-187. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/4801

Mateu, A. & Domínguez, M. (2017). Unravelling environment and politics in the Spanish press: From Franco’s dictatorship to democracy. Communication & Society, 30(2), 61-76. https://www.doi.org/10.15581/003.30.2.61-77

Meadows, M. & Thomson, R. (2014). Campaigning journalism: The early press, environmental advocacy and national parks. In L. Lester & B. Hutchins (Eds.), Environmental conflict and the media (pp. 37-48). New York: Peter Lang.

Metag, J., Schäfer, M. S., Füchslin, T., Barsuhn, T. & Kleinen-Von Königslöw, K. (2016). Perceptions on climate change imagery: Evoked salience and self-efficacy in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Science Communication, 38(2), 197-227. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/1075547016635181

Mitman, T., Nikolaev, A. & Porpora, D. (2012). The critical moral voice on American newspaper opinion pages. Communication, Culture & Critique, 5(3), 392-408. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2012.01128.x

Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment, 51(2), 12-23.

Nisbet, M. C. (2010). Knowledge into action: Framing debates over climate change and poverty. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis. Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 43-83). Nova York: Routledge.

O’Neil, S., Williams, H. T. P., Kurz, T., Wiersma, B. & Boykoff, M. (2015). Dominant frames in legacy and social media coverage of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Nature Climate Change, 5, 380-385. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2535

Olausson, U. (2011). “We’re the ones to blame”: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environmental Communication, 5(3), 281–299. https://www.doi.org/ 10.1080/17524032.2011.585026

Olausson, U. & Berglez, P. (2014). Media and climate change: Four long-standing research challenges revisited. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 249–265. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.906483

Pan, Y., Opgenhaffe, M. & Van Gorp, B. (2019). Negotiating climate change: A frame analysis of COP21 in British, American, and Chinese news media. Public Understanding of Science, 28(5), 519-533. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662518823969

Ross, A. D. & Rivers, D. J. (2019). Internet memes, media frames, and the conflicting logics of climate change discourse. Environmental Communication (published online). https://www.doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1560347

Schäfer, M. S. & O’Neil, S. (2017). Frame analysis in climate change communication. In S. Ho, E. Markowitz, S. O’Neil, M. Nisbet, J. Thaker & M. S. Schäfer (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (online publication). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.487

Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x

Scheufele, D. A. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x

Taylor, D. E. (2000). The rise of the environmental justice paradigm: Injustice framing and the social construction of environmental discourses. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(4), 508-580. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002764200043004003

Valera Ordaz, L. (2016). El sesgo mediocéntrico del framing en España: Una revision crítica de la aplicación de la teoría del encuadre en los estudios de comunicación. Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 21(41), 13-31. https://www.doi.org/10.1387/zer.16404

Valera Ordaz, L. & López García, G. (2014). Agenda and frames in the websites of the People’s Party (PP) and the Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE) in the 2011 cyber campaing. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 69, 41-66. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2014-1000en

Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60-78. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00329.x

Vicente-Mariño, M. (2010). Agendas, encuadres y discursos en los noticiarios televisivos españoles durante la crisis del Prestige. Athenea Digital, 19, 249-257. Retrieved from http://psicologiasocial.uab.es/athenea/index.php/atheneaDigital/article/view/785

Vicente Mariño, M. & López Rabadán, P. (2009). Resultados actuales de la investigación sobre framing: sólido avance internacional y arranque de la especialidad en España. Zer Revista de Estudios de Comunicación, 14(26), 13-34. Retrieved from https://www.ehu.eus/ojs/index.php/Zer/article/view/2750

Vliegenthart, R. & van Zoonen, L. (2011). Power to the frame: Bringing sociology back to frame analysis. European Journal of Communication, 26(2), 101-115. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0637323111404838

Young, N. (2013). Working the fringes: The roles of letters to the editor in advancing nonstandard media narratives about climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 443–459. https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0963662511414983


Metrics





Search GoogleScholar

















Licencia de Creative Commons
Communication & Society is published under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0.