Autores: de la Rosa Fernández Pacheco, Pedro Antonio (Autor de correspondencia); Cowden, R. G.; de Filippis, R.; Jerotic, S.; Nahidi, M.; Ori, D.; Orsolini, L.; Nagendrappa, S.; Pinto Da Costa, M.; Ransing, R.; Saeed, F.; Shoib, S.; Turan, S.; Ullah, I.; Vadivel, R.; Ramalho, R.
Resumen:
Objectives: We examined the associations of lockdown stringency and duration with Google searches for four mental health concepts (i.e., Anxiety, Depression, Suicide, Mental Health) in nine countries (i.e., Hungary, India, Iran, Italy, Paraguay, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Turkey) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We retrieved national-level data for each country from Google Trends and the Global Panel Database of Pandemic Policies. In our primary analysis, we used data from all countries to estimate a set of multilevel regression models examining associations of overall lockdown stringency and lockdown duration with relative search volumes for each mental health term. We repeated the models after replacing overall lockdown stringency with each of the lockdown stringency components. Results: A negative association was found between overall lockdown stringency and Depression. Lockdown duration and the most stringent stay-at-home requirements were negatively associated with Anxiety. Policies that recommended or required the cancelation of public events evidenced negative associations with Depression, whereas associations between policies that required some or all levels of schooling to close and Depression were positive. Policies that recommended or required workplaces to close and those that enforced quarantines on non-citizens arriving from high-risk regions or closed borders entirely were negatively associated with Suicide.
