Detalle Publicación

OPTIMIZATION OF ASSESSMENT OF DISEASE PROGRESSION BETWEEN BLINDED CENTRAL INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND INVESTIGATOR ASSESSMENT IN THE PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG3012 TRIAL

Autores: Herzog, T.; Wahab, S. A.; Mirza, M.; Pothuri, B.; Vergote, I.; Graybill, W. S.; Malinowska, I. A.; York, W.; Hurteau, J. A.; Gupta, D.; González Martín, Antonio; Monk, B.
Título de la revista: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
ISSN: 1048-891X
Volumen: 32
Número: SUPPL 3
Páginas: A140 - A141
Fecha de publicación: 2022
Resumen:
Objectives Progression-free survival (PFS) is a rational surrogate primary endpoint in ovarian cancer (OC) trials. However, PFS is subject to biases, with validity dependent upon proper methodologic assessment. Therefore, blinded independent centralized radiologic review (BICR) is often recommended. We evaluated BICR and investigator-assessed evaluation of progressive disease (PD) in the PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial examining niraparib monotherapy in intent-to-treat (ITT) and homologous recombination deficient (HRd) populations. Methods In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 trial, patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV OC were assigned to receive either niraparib or placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS (per RECIST v.1.1) by BICR. Discordance between BICR and investigator assessments of PD ([#BICR reviews with unconfirmed PD assessment]/[total# investigator-triggered reviews]) was monitored throughout the study. A training intervention was developed for BICR reviewers based on PD determination in OC. Results In an initial patient subset (n=80), a 39% discordance rate was identified between BICR and investigator-assessed PD by the sponsor, most commonly due to peritoneal carcinomatosis or fluid collections arising from new non-target lesions. After reviewer intervention, final discordance rate between BICR and investigator improved to 12% and 13% for ITT (N=733) and HRd (n=373) populations, respectively (figure 1). Across the entire study population, median PFS and hazard ratios for the ITT and HRd populations were comparable between BICR and investigator (table 1). Conclusions PRIMA/ENGOT-ov26/GOG-3012 highlights the need to optimize BICR and investigator concordance using early, specialized OC-specific training to maximize trial validity.
Impacto: