Detalle Publicación

ARTÍCULO
Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Autores: Ricke, J. (Autor de correspondencia); Schinner, R.; Seidensticker, M.; Gasbarrini, A.; van Delden, O. M.; Amthauer, H.; Peynircioglu, B.; Bargellini, I.; Iezzi, R.; De Toni, E. N.; Malfertheiner, P.; Pech, M.; Sangro Gómez-Acebo, Bruno Carlos
Título de la revista: JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY (ONLINE)
ISSN: 0168-8278
Volumen: 75
Número: 6
Páginas: 1387 - 1396
Fecha de publicación: 2021
Lugar: WOS
Resumen:
Background & Aims: SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function. Methods: The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. >= 65 years-old, Child Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol-vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up. Results: ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age >= 65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08). Conclusion: SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy. Clinical trial number: EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 Lay summary: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.(C) 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.