Contenido principal
Ir al contenido principal
Menú de navegación
No hay
Navegación secundaria
disponible para el sitio actual.
Selector de idioma
Es
En
Español
English
Cerrar
Nuestros investigadores
Menú de navegación
No hay
Navegación secundaria
disponible para el sitio actual.
Menú de navegación
No hay
Navegación secundaria
disponible para el sitio actual.
Nuestros investigadores
Cerrar
Ruta de navegación
Estás en:
Investigacion
Nuestros investigadores
Publicaciones de nuestros investigadores
Publicaciones de nuestros investigadores - Investigacion
Detalle Publicación
Consensus document on the progression and treatment response criteria in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
Autores:
Merino-Casabiel, X.; Aller, J.;
Arbizu Lostao, Javier
; Garcia-Figueiras, R.; Gonzalez, C.; Grande, E. ; Jimenez-Fonseca, P. ; Sevilla, M. I. ; Capdevila, J. (Autor de correspondencia)
Título de la revista:
CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY
ISSN:
1699-048X
Volumen:
20
Número:
12
Páginas:
1522 - 1528
Fecha de publicación:
2018
Resumen:
PurposeGastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a heterogeneous group of low incidence neoplasms characterized by a low proliferative activity and slow growth. Their response to targeted therapies is heterogeneous and often does not lead to tumor shrinkage. Thus, evaluation of the therapeutic response should differ from other kind of tumors.MethodsTo answer relevant questions about which techniques are best in the assessment of progression or treatment response a RAND/UCLA-based consensus process was implemented. Relevant clinical questions were listed followed by a systematic search of the literature. The expert panel answered all questions with recommendations, combining available evidence and expert opinion. Recommendations were validated through a questionnaire and a participatory meeting.ResultsExpert recommendations regarding imaging tools for tumor assessment and evaluation of progression were agreed upon. Available imaging techniques were reviewed and recommendations for best patient monitoring practice and the best way to evaluate treatment response were formulated.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-018-1881-9
Impacto:
9 citas en
10 citas en
Google Scholar
Oculto