Background: The main objective was to evaluate the efficacy of intranasal photodynamic therapy (PDT) in SARS-CoV-2 mildly symptomatic carriers on decreasing the infectivity period. SARS-CoV-2-specific immune-stimulating effects and safety were also analysed. Methods: We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial in a tertiary hospital (NCT05184205). Patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in the last 48 hours were recruited and aleatorily assigned to PDT or placebo. Patients with pneumonia were excluded. Participants and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was the reduction in in vitro infectivity of nasopharyngeal samples at days 3 and 7. Additional outcomes included safety assessment and quantification of humoral and T-cell immune-responses. Findings: Patients were recruited between December 2021 and February 2022. Most were previously healthy adults vaccinated against COVID-19 and most carried Omicron variant. 38 patients were assigned to placebo and 37 to PDT. Intranasal PDT reduced infectivity at day 3 post-treatment when compared to placebo with a ß-coefficient of -812.2 (CI95%= -478660 ¿ -1.3, p<0.05) infectivity arbitrary units. The probability of becoming PCR negative (ct>34) at day 7 was higher on the PDT-group, with an OR of 0.15 (CI95%=0.04-0.58). There was a decay in anti-Spike titre and specific SARS-CoV-2 T cell immunity in the placebo group 10 and 20 weeks after infection, but not in the PDT-group. No serious adverse events were reported. Interpretation: Intranasal-PDT is safe in pauci-symptomatic COVID-19 patients, it reduces SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and decelerates the decline SARS-CoV-2 specific immune-responses.

In the last few years there has been an increase of implantable cardiac electronic device and vascular graft related infections. This is due in part to a higher complexity of some of these procedures and an increase in patient's comorbidities. Despite wide diagnosis methods availability, early stage diagnosis usually constitutes a challenge as often patients only denote insidious symptoms. In most confirmed cases, removal of the infected device is required to resolve the infection. This is mostly explainable because of bacterial ability to grow as biofilms on biomaterial surfaces, conferring them antimicrobial resistance. If removal is not possible, chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy could be an option.

Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus have had classically an important impact in morbidity and mortality in the nosocomial and community scene. The description of methicillin resistance among nosocomial isolates of S. aureus and his widespread diffusion has become methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in one of the most common causes of bacterial nosocomial infections. In the last years MRSA strains have also emergence in the community. This together with a progressive increase in resistance to antibiotics used classically has become vancomycin in the treatment of choice in most cases according to clinical guidelines. As a result, a progressive rise in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin has been reported. In this context strains with intermediate susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC 8-4 mg/L) and heteroresistance have been noted. These strains are associated with a higher risk of treatment failure when using vancomycin. Among isolates of S. aureus susceptible to vancomycin there has been described stains with elevated MICs (¿1.5 mg/L). It is controversial if the presence of these strains has an impact on clinical outcome if treatment with vancomycin or ß-lactams is prescribed. The development of new antibiotics with activity against MRSA and exploring synergies offer a promising alternative to treatment with vancomycin.