Objective: To compare the findings on chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with COVID-19 during different phases of the disease and to evaluate the reproducibility of a visual radiologic score for estimating the extent of lung involvement. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed chest CT studies from 182 patients with RT-PCR findings positive for SARS-CoV-2. Patients were classified according to the time elapsed from the onset of symptoms, as follows: early (0-4 days), intermediate/progressive (5-9 days), or advanced (>= 10 days). We analyzed the frequency of each radiologic finding, as well as the pattern, appearance, and predominant distribution of lung involvement. A visual tomographic score (range, 0-25) was used to estimate the extent of involvement in each lobe and in the total lung volume. Results: The predominant CT finding was the ground-glass pattern (n=110; 60.4%), the most common distribution was peripheral (n = 116; 66.7%), and the most prevalent appearance was typical (n=112; 61.5%). The halo sign was seen most frequently in the early phase (25%), whereas ground-glass opacities were more common in the intermediate/progressive and advanced phases. The median severity score was 10 (IQR: 5-13), and the scores increased as the disease progressed. The interobserver agreement (kappa) was 0.92 for the appearance, 0.84 for the distribution, 0.70 for the predominant pattern, and 0.89 for the visual score. Conclusion: The CT findings in patients with COVID-19 vary with the course of the infection. The proposed visual radiologic score is a simple, reproducible, and reliable tool for assessing lung involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia. (C) 2021 SERAM. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of practical ultrasound workshops for the acquisition and consolidation of conceptual learning about the basic physics and semiology of ultrasonography aimed at third-year medical school students doing the physical examination module of their studies. Material and methods: We carried out practical ultrasound workshops with two groups of 177 and 175 students in two consecutive academic years. All students had taken a class in basic radiology in the previous year. Students examined each other with ultrasonography under instructors' supervision in a two-hour session. Before and after the workshop, students did a seven-question multiple-choice test about basic semiology and answered two questions evaluating their degree of confidence in interpreting ultrasonographic images and handling the ultrasound scanner on a scale from 1 to 10. Results: No significant differences were found between the scores obtained in the two groups. Overall, the mean score on the multiple-choice test improved from 59.71% on the initial assessment to 88.29% on the post-workshop assessment (p <0.01). Confidence in interpreting images improved from 3.39/10 to 6.28/10 (p <0.01), and confidence in handling the equipment improved from 3.73/10 to 6.51/10 (p <0.01). Conclusion: Practical workshops were useful for learning basic concepts about ultrasound imaging, allowing students to significantly improve their scores on the multiple-choice test. Students had a low level of confidence in their ability to interpret ultrasound images and handle the equipment before starting the workshop, but their confidence improved significantly after completing the workshop.

Objectives: To analyze the feasibility of DWI-MRI and ADC to evaluate treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). To correlate the variations of ADC and SUVmax in 18F-FDG PET-CT. Methods: 27 patients with MM that had a whole-body MRI and 18F-FDG PET-CT performed at baseline and after treatment were retrospectively recruited between February 2018 and May 2020. Three target bone lesions were selected for each patient and their ADC, SUVmax and Deauville score were measured in every study. Correlation between ADC and SUVmax of the lesions was evaluated, as well as changes in mean ADC, SUVmax, and Deauville score between studies. Patients were classified as responder or non-responder according to the IMWG, MRI (MY-RADS) and PET-CT (IMPeTUs) response criteria. Agreement between the MRI and PET-CT criteria with the IMWG criteria was evaluated. Results: The correlation between the ADC and SUVmax of all the target lesions was strong, negative and significant (r=-0.603; p < 0.001). After treatment, mean ADC in lesions from responders was significantly higher than in non-responders (1585.51 × 10-6 mm2/s vs 698.17 × 10-6 mm2/s; p < 0.001). SUVmax of the same lesions was significantly lower in responders than in non-responders (2.05 vs 5.33; p < 0.001). There was a very strong or strong agreement of the IMWG response criteria with both MRI (¿ = 0.852; p < 0.001) and PET (¿ = 0.767; p < 0.001) criteria. Conclusion: DWI-MRI and ADC may be used to assess treatment response in MM patients, showing a good correlation with 18F-FDG PET-CT and the IMWG response criteria.

Objectives: To analyze the feasibility of DWI-MRI and ADC to evaluate treatment response in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). To correlate the variations of ADC and SUVmax in F-18-FDG PET-CT. Methods: 27 patients with MM that had a whole-body MRI and F-18-FDG PET-CT performed at baseline and after treatment were retrospectively recruited between February 2018 and May 2020. Three target bone lesions were selected for each patient and their ADC, SUVmax and Deauville score were measured in every study. Correlation between ADC and SUVmax of the lesions was evaluated, as well as changes in mean ADC, SUVmax, and Deauville score between studies. Patients were classified as responder or non-responder according to the IMWG, MRI (MY-RADS) and PET-CT (IMPeTUs) response criteria. Agreement between the MRI and PET-CT criteria with the IMWG criteria was evaluated. Results: The correlation between the ADC and SUVmax of all the target lesions was strong, negative and significant (r=-0.603; p < 0.001). After treatment, mean ADC in lesions from responders was significantly higher than in non-responders (1585.51 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s vs 698.17 x 10(-6) mm(2)/s; p < 0.001). SUVmax of the same lesions was significantly lower in responders than in non-responders (2.05 vs 5.33; p < 0.001). There was a very strong or strong agreement of the IMWG response criteria with both MRI (kappa = 0.852; p < 0.001) and PET (kappa = 0.767; p < 0.001) criteria. Conclusion: DWI-MRI and ADC may be used to assess treatment response in MM patients, showing a good correlation with F-18-FDG PET-CT and the IMWG response criteria.