Detalle Publicación

ARTÍCULO

F-18-FDG PET bio-metabolic monitoring of neoadjuvant therapy effects in rectal cancer: Focus on nodal disease characteristics

Autores: Calvo Manuel, Felipe (Autor de correspondencia); Cabezon, L. ; Gonzalez, C. ; Soria, A.; de la Mata, D. ; Gomez-Espi, M.; Garcia-Alfonso, P. ; Alvarez, E.; Carreras, J. L.
Título de la revista: RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
ISSN: 0167-8140
Volumen: 97
Número: 2
Páginas: 212 - 216
Fecha de publicación: 2010
Resumen:
Objective: To evaluate efficacy of F-18-FDG PET(CT) in the staging and re staging of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, its potential role in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy. Patients and methods: Patients with confirmed diagnosis of rectal cancer (T2-4 or N+) were prospectively studied with F-18-FDG PET before and after neoadjuvant therapy. Surgery was programmed 4-6 weeks after treatment followed by an expert histological analysis of the surgical specimen. Response to neoadjuvant treatment was assessed using two specific variables: difference ins SUV (difSUV) pre/post-neoadjuvant treatment and response index (RI). Results: A total of 64 patients were enrolled for pathologicla and bio-metabolic response assessment. Compared to cNo, cN+ Patients had a higher SUV1 mean value (6.5 vs. 7.6. p = 0.04) and ypN+ patients had higher SUV2 mean values (2.4 vs 3.5, P = 0.06), difSUV values of >= 4 was the most efficient diagnositic parameter (sensitivity = 45.8%, specificity = 86.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 73.3%, negative predictive value(NPV) = 65.7%). With an RI of 66.6%, and NPV = 57.8%. Patients who experienced disease progression had an RI <= 66% and a difSUV <= 4. Conclusion: F-18-FDG PET has proven to be an accurate diagnostic technique for assessing rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy. The results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were similar, if not superior, to those reported with other diagnositc imaging techniques. (C) Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 97 (2010) 212-216
Impacto: