Nuestros investigadores

Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe 

Publicaciones científicas más recientes (desde 2010)

Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: ANUARIO FILOSOFICO
ISSN 0066-5215  Vol. 51  Nº 1  2018  págs. 172 - 175
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: DESIGNIS
ISSN 1578-4223  Vol. 25  2016  págs. 89 - 97
En este artículo estudio cómo Jerónimo Pardo (un autor español del terminismo tardío) introduce subdivisiones en la noción de ¿significación¿ para analizar la posibilidad y límites de la suposición material como instrumento de autorreferencialidad. Estas subdivisiones no son ad hoc, puesto que distintos conceptos median de distintos modos en la significación del lenguaje vocal.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY
ISSN 0960-8788  Vol. 24  Nº 3  2016  págs. 512 - ­531
I examine a sixteenth-century development of the anti-realist propositional semantics which is based on the notion of `mode¿. Pardo uses this notion to offer a personal interpretation of the Buridanian criticism of complexe significabilia. He develops a middle way between the reduction of the significate of propositions to particular things and the postulation of non-standard entities which are only complexly signifiable. The key to this middle way is Pardo's understanding of the notion of `mode¿ as connoting a relation between individual things. He offers a new interpretation of the signification of syncategorematic terms, and a definition of `comparative¿ notions, by which something is known `relatively¿ with respect to some other thing. And a real relational correlate is postulated for these relational ways of knowing. Relations are thus used to grant a specific significate of propositions, without renouncing the strict Buridanian rejection of any extra-categorial complexe significabilia. The role of relations in Pardo's propositional semantics consists in allowing a new (intensional) understanding of the significate of propositions.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: ANUARIO FILOSOFICO
ISSN 0066-5215  Vol. 48  Nº 2  2015  págs. 361 - 364
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: ANUARIO DE HISTORIA DE LA IGLESIA
ISSN 1133-0104  Vol. 24  2015  págs. 451 - 454
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma; Cerezo, María;
Título: Introduction
Revista: VIVARIUM. AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY AND INTELLECTUAL LIFE OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND RENAISSANCE
ISSN 0042-7543  Vol. 53  Nº 2 - 4  2015  págs. 139 - 141
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: VIVARIUM. AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY AND INTELLECTUAL LIFE OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND RENAISSANCE
ISSN 0042-7543  Vol. 53  Nº 2 - 4  2015  págs. 405 - 423
This article deals with a brief difficultas in the Tractatus de compositione propositionis mentalis by Fernando de Enzinas: qualiter copule significent tempus et an copule de presenti et preterito sint synonime. A progressive determination of the signification of the copula is analysed: first, Enzinas defines his position about the principal syncategorematic signification of the copula; then, he analyses the sense of the consignification of time traditionally attributed to the copula. The originality of Enzinas¿ position is highlighted, given the fact that he gives preference to the question as to how the copulae signify time rather than the question as to which time the copulae signify.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: MATHEMATICAL REVIEWS
ISSN 0025-5629  2014 
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: Mathematical Reviews-a reviewing journal covering the world literature of mathematical research
ISSN 0025-5629  2013  págs. 
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: Vivarium-an international journal for the philosophy and intellectual life of the Middle Ages and Re
ISSN 0042-7543  Vol. 49  Nº 1/3  2011  págs. 127 - 149
In 1980 L. M. de Rijk edited some texts connected with medieval disputation (Die mittelaterlichen Traktate De modo opponendi et respondendi), towards which he showed a strikingly contemptuous attitude. The reason for his contempt was that the treatises did not fit the obligationes and sophismata tradition. In this article I focus on the original version, the Thesaurus Philosophorum, to highlight the distinction of this family of treatises with respect to the ¿modern¿ tradition. First, I study the features of the disputation that can be recognised through the collection of fallacious arguments contained in the Thesaurus. Second, I briefly examine the contents of the treatise and their arrangement, showing that they are closely related to the kind of disputation in question. I hope to support the idea that neither the technique of disputation nor the contents and their arrangement deserve a straightforward rejection.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Revista: VIVARIUM. AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY AND INTELLECTUAL LIFE OF THE MIDDLE AGES AND RENAISSANCE
ISSN 0042-7543  Vol. 49  Nº 1-3  2011  págs. 127 - 149
In 1980 L. M. de Rijk edited some texts connected with medieval disputation (Die mittelaterlichen Traktate De modo opponendi et respondendi), towards which he showed a strikingly contemptuous attitude. The reason for his contempt was that the treatises did not fit the obligationes and sophismata tradition. In this article I focus on the original version, the Thesaurus Philosophorum, to highlight the distinction of this family of treatises with respect to the ¿modern¿ tradition. First, I study the features of the disputation that can be recognised through the collection of fallacious arguments contained in the Thesaurus. Second, I briefly examine the contents of the treatise and their arrangement, showing that they are closely related to the kind of disputation in question. I hope to support the idea that neither the technique of disputation nor the contents and their arrangement deserve a straightforward rejection.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Libro:  History of logic and semantics
2017  págs. 260 - 277
This article deals with a brief difficultas in the Tractatus de compositione propositionis mentalis by Fernando de Enzinas: qualiter copule significent tempus et an copule de presenti et preterito sint synonime. A progressive determination of the signification of the copula is analysed: first, Enzinas defines his position about the principal syncategorematic signification of the copula; then, he analyses the sense of the consignification of time traditionally attributed to the copula. The originality of Enzinas’ position is highlighted, given the fact that he gives preference to the question as to how the copulae signify time rather than the question as to which time the copulae signify.
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Libro:  Formal approaches and natural language in medieval logic
2016  págs. 325 - 340
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma; María Cerezo;
Libro:  Logik, naturphilosophie, dialektik: neue internationale Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik
2014  págs. 75 - 103
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Libro:  Logic and Language in the Middle Ages. Festschrift for Sten Ebbesen in his 60 Birthday.
Vol. 4  2012  págs. 287-305
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Libro:  Pragmatism in the Americas
2011  págs. 120 - 134
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Sofisma
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 1032 - 1034
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Deducción
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 287 - 289
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Silogismo
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 1026 - 1029
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Verificación
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 1150 - 1153
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Definición
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 289 - 291
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Suposición
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 1044 - 1047
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Hipótesis
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 524 - 527
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma;
Título: Demostración
Libro:  Diccionario de Filosofía
2010  págs. 299 - 301
Autores: Pérez-Ilzarbe, Paloma, (Editor); M. Cerezo, (Editor)
2017 
This volume pays homage to the historian of logic Angel d¿Ors (1951-2012), by bringing together a set of studies that together illuminate the complex historical development of logic and semantics. Two main traditions, Aristotelian and terminist, are showcased to demonstrate the changes and confrontations that constitute this history, and a number of different authors and texts, from the Boethian reception of Aristotle to the post-medieval terminism, are discussed. Special topics dealt with include the medieval reception of ancient logic; technical tools for the medieval analysis of language; the medieval theory of consequence; the medieval practice of disputation and sophisms; and the post-medieval refinement of the terminist tools. Contributors are E.J. Ashworth, Allan Bäck, María Cerezo, Sten Ebbesen, José Miguel Gambra, C.H. Kneepkens, Kalvin Normore, Angel d¿Ors, Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe, Stephen Read, Joke Spruyt, Luisa Valente, and Mikko Yrjönsuuri.